Windows 8 First Thoughts

[sc:windows-category ]Windows 8 was released on to TechNet last week and I took the plunge and installed it on my laptop.

The first thing I have to say is that like everything Microsoft has done with Metro, or as they’re now calling it Modern UI, it’s fast a fluid.  Much more so then I expected really.

Boot up times are amazingly quick and the interface does feel polished as well.  For what had to be a pretty quick development cycle, MS has done a fantastic job of making it feel “right”.

Of course, not everything is perfect.  I did run in to some hiccups with my chosen desktop background disappearing, but moving the jpeg from my network drive to the local drive seems to have cleared that problem up.

Something I am surprised at is that there is no tutorial on the new interface provided.  Your just dropped right in to it cold turkey.  Not an issue for me, but I imagine less technically proficient people might wonder what’s going on in some cases.

First off the new start screen (its can no longer be called just a menu), its Live Tiles and it’s nice.  The tiles can be resized and just like on Windows Phone, provide information at a glance.

Something I often do in Windows 7 is use the search feature on the start menu to find the programs I’m looking for and I was pleasantly surprised that this functionality is carried over in to Windows 8.  Just pull up the start screen and start typing and a search list pops up.

One small annoyance I did find with the start screen was scrolling left and right by “pushing” to the edge of the display didn’t seem all that smooth and using the scroll bar at the bottom.  Obviously in the touch interface this is just a drag left/right gesture.  I did however find the scroll wheel worked quite well.

Speaking of the left/right scroll in the new interface, I found it very inconsistent between apps if “pushing” on the edge of the screen worked.  For example in the Start screen it does, but not in the Windows Store.

The charm areas in the four corners of the screen are another new feature in Windows 8.  In general they’re easy to use but every once in a while I do find myself hitting the right hand ones by accident.  Not a big deal and I suspect over time I won’t do it nearly as often.

The single biggest pet peeve I have so far with Windows 8 is the virtual requirement for a Microsoft Account.  I already have one so it’s not a big deal from that perspective, but it just grates me the wrong way that for most of the new stuff you need to be connected to a MS account.  It’s just a matter of principle.

The built-in apps are quite nicely done, even if they are a little simplistic.  Mail is the obvious big one and its nice that it connects to Exchange through ActiveSync.  Likewise Calendar and People automatically get hooked up to Exchange and my other social networks that I had already setup to use with my Microsoft account for my phone.

The one problem I did have with Mail was the folder list.  There is no way (that I’ve found at least) to filter the list and I have dozens of folders.  In Outlook I setup shortcuts to my commonly used folders as I receive most of my news through RSS feeds and they are buried deep in the folder list in Mail.

Something I do like is how you can split the screen in to two apps, one small and one large.  You can even do this with the classic desktop as one of them as well.  It’s very cool having MetroTwit on the left as a single column and the Windows desktop as the rest of the screen 🙂

At the end of the day, Windows 8 is a major change and it will still take some getting use to, but I think Microsoft has the right idea.  Something I have noticed in various people I’ve talked to is that views are very different between techies and regular users.  Techies seem to see it as some kind of assult, the dumbing down of their PC’s.  Users just don’t seem to care nearly as much.

I don’t think it’s the end of the PC as we know it, just the PC finally growing up and showing it can be more than just technology.

Preparing for Windows 8

[sc:windows-category ]On Wednesday Microsoft will be releasing Windows 8 RTM to TechNet and so I will soon have to decide what I’m going to do with the various systems I run.

I currently have 3 installs of Windows 7:

  1. My main PC at home
  2. My laptop
  3. A VM

The first two seem easy enough, they will get Windows 8 installed at some point (I’ve been limping along on my main PC for a while with some weird issues and a new MB I haven’t installed yet, waiting for Win8).

The VM on the other hand brings up some questions.  Will Win8 run well in a VM where the primary access is through RDP?  Will I need to give the VM more resources?

I belive the plan of attack will be:

  • Install Win8 on my laptop
  • Run it for a few weeks
  • Format my PC’s hard disk
  • Swap the MB
  • Install Win8 on my PC
  • Test Win8 running through RDP on my desktop
  • Create a new VM and install Win8
  • Test some more 😉

I’ll post some follow up articles as I complete the various steps.

Windows 8 and Metro Apps

[sc:windows-category ]Microsoft is moving full steam ahead on Metro in Window 8 but some of their decisions seem a little wrong to me.

For example, they have decided to limit Metro apps to be installed from the Windows Store only.  Ok, obviously this is inspired from the mobile world, where Apple pioneered this model, but we’re talking about a desktop OS here.  Everyone is used to installing apps on their desktops and there is no benefit to end users to limit it to the store.

You could argue about safety and security, but as all the vendors have found out, spyware and malware make their way in to the online stores all the time.

So what’s really behind the move?  Money of course!

Limiting Metro apps the store only means Microsoft can take a 30% (or whatever they decide) cut of each app purchased and as Apple has found out, that can add up quickly.

There have been many articles on “The War on General Purpose Computing” and this is just the latest salvo.

I’m fundamentally opposed to this position, it’s my hardware, let me install what I want.  I’m not a child and I don’t need big brother to decide what I install.

Anyway, how long do you think it will take the hackers to bypass this restriction?  If they can do it almost same day as release on an iPhone with limited tools and documentation, image what they will be able to do on a full-blown PC.

Of course just to make matters worse, Microsoft now says that in Windows RT, you will be able to load your own Metro apps, if you’re an enterprise customer.  So will that mean as long as a publisher has a valid signing certificate of some kind you will be able to load their app on to your device?  Will this hold true for the standard Windows 8?

So many questions, I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

Opera 12

[sc:software-category ]I love Opera, it’s a great web browser, but the recently released version 12 was kind of a let down.

After all it was a full whole number release but there wasn’t any real user visible major changes.  The only thing that was really visible to users was the removal of Unite/Widgets in favour of extensions.  Which is fine and all but I was kind of expecting more.

I guess when you’ve had such a great run of major releases like Opera, the expectations are hard to meet every time 😉

The new theme engine is nice and all, but I really don’t use theme’s on any of my apps, I want function over form and the default theme is pretty much the definition of this in Opera.

I wonder if they’re working on a Metro version for Windows 8?

Microsoft Surface

[sc:windows-category ]Ok, first things first, we’re talking tablets, not big touchscreens.

I kind of have to question the decision to go with Surface when they already had a product named that, but I guess as a niche product the old Surface didn’t have consumer awareness.

Now I’ve been a pretty harsh critic of crossover devices over the years, things like the ASUS Transformer convertibles just didn’t get me excited as they added far too much bulk to the device to be truly useful.

However, Microsoft seems to have known this and agreed, the new Surface Touch Cover is on 3mm think and that’s impressive in its self, but paired with the tablets it’s really a nice looking package.

The tablets themselves look quite nice as well, the hardware looks to be current spec and while they were a little short on details, it looks like they’ve spent quite a bit of time and effort to get it right.  The only concern I have is the screen size/ratio.  I really like the 4:3 aspect ratio on the HP TouchPad, I’m not sure a wide screen tablet works, but just about everyone has moved to 16:9.

There has been a lot of speculation around the net on how little MS must trust its hardware partners (like HP/Dell/ASUS/etc) to make a tablet to have had to do it themselves, but really is that a surprise?  They’ve all been floundering around for the last couple of years trying to make an Android tablet to complete with the iPad and have been failing pretty well.

I’ve been thinking about it a bit and what I belive the real problem is that the big PC guys (HP/Dell/etc) don’t get consumer electronics as they have been building beige boxes for the last 3 decades with a speed of innovation (while impressive in the greater world) could be described as glacier like in the new mobile world.  Likewise the mobile guys (Samsung/HTC/etc) have an ethos of scorched earth on every iteration of their products, they don’t worry about backwards compatibility they only drive towards smaller, faster, longer lasting, cheaper.

Microsoft doesn’t have a partner that has the right mix of goals to create better/different hardware (this actually includes PC and phones too, though it looks like Nokia solves at least the phone issue) and so they have headed out on their own.

And it’s not the first time either.  Few probably remember that the Sega Genesis had an MS OS under its hood, when that failed, MS built the Xbox.

Microsoft isn’t quite abandoning their hardware partners though, more like showing them the way.  With limited distribution of the Surface to just the MS stores, mass market penetration is unlikely to happen.  However MS can always expand distribution if their hardware partners don’t bring up the bar with Windows 8.

I think this is a good move on MS’s part, it let’s them lead by example.  In fact they may want to do something similar in the PC space, Apple has had a free hand for too long in leading change in the laptop space and MS could shake that up.

So the question is, will I buy one?  Yes and probably on of each.  The Surface RT is going to come out first and while I have reservations about the RT variant of Windows 8 (will it run everything I want) I expect it will still be functional enough.  The Surface Pro version will of course run everything I want as it’s a full-blown PC.